igoro.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the igoro.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host igoro.com. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is SoftLayer Technologies Inc. .

forumprawne.org 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called AUTOM8N-nginx containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

home about igor ostrovsky blogging on programming, technology, and random things of interest algorithms cool stuff c# robozzle concurrency misc sep 29 how raid-6 dual parity calculation works igor ostrovsky on september 29th, 2014 parity protection is a common technique for reliable data storage on mediums that may fail (hdds, ssds, storage servers, etc.) calculation of parity uses tools from algebra in very interesting ways, in particular in the dual parity case. this article is for computer engineers who would like to have a high-level understanding of how the dual parity calculation works, without diving into all of the mathematical details. single parity let’s start with the simple case – single parity. as an example, say that you need to reliably store 5 data blocks of a fixed size (e.g., 4kb). you can put the 5 data blocks on 5 different storage devices, and then store a parity block on a 6th device. if any one device fails, you can still recompute the block from the failed device, and so you haven’t lost any data. a simple way to calculate the parity p is just to combine the values a, b, c, d, e with the exclusive-or (xor) operator: p = a xor b xor c xor d xor e effectively, every parity bit protects the corresponding bits of a, b, c, d, e . if the first parity bit is 0, you know that the number of 1 bits among the first bits of a, b, c, d, e is even. otherwise the number of 1 bits is odd. given a, b, c, e and p , it is easy to reconstruct the missing block d : d = p xor a xor b xor c xor e straightforward so far. exclusive-or parity is commonly used in storage systems as raid-5 configuration: raid-5 uses the exclusive-or parity approach, except that the placement of parity is rotated among the storage devices. parity blocks gets more overwrites than data blocks, so it makes sense to distribute them among the devices. what about double parity? single parity protects data against the loss of a single storage device. but, what if you want protection against the loss off two devices? can we extend the parity idea to protect the data even in that scenario? it turns out that we can. consider defining p and q like this: p = a + b + c + d + e q = 1 a + 2 b + 3 c + 4 d + 5 e if you lose any two of { a, b, c, d, e, p, q }, you can recover them by plugging in the known values into the equations above, and solving for the two unknowns. simple. for example, say that { a, b, c, d, e } are { 10, 5, 8, 13, 2 }. then: p = 10 + 5 + 8 + 13 + 2 = 38 q = 10 + 2 × 5 + 3 × 8 + 4 × 13 + 5 × 2 = 106 if you lost c and d , you can recover them by solving the original equations. how come you can always solve the equations? to explain why we can always solve the equations to recover two missing blocks, we need to take a short detour into matrix algebra. we can express the relationship between a, b, c, d, e, p, q as the following matrix-vector multiplication: we have 7 linear equations of 5 variables. in our example, we lose blocks c and d and end up with 5 equations of 5 variables. effectively, we lost two rows in the matrix and the two matching rows in the result vector: this system of equations is solvable because the matrix is invertible: the five rows are all linearly independent. in fact, if you look at the original matrix, any five rows would have been linearly independent, so we could solve the equations regardless of which two devices were missing. but, integers are inconvenient… calculating p and q from the formulas above will allow you to recover up to two lost data blocks. but, there is an annoying technical problem: the calculated values of p and q can be significantly larger than the original data values. for example, if the data block is 1 byte, its value ranges from 0 to 255. but in that case, the q value can reach 3825! ideally, you’d want p and q to have the same range as the data values themselves. for example, if you are dealing with 1-byte blocks, it would be ideal if p and q were 1 byte as well. we’d like to redefine the arithmetic operators +, –, ×, / such that our equations still work, but the values of p and q stay within the ranges of the input values. thankfully, this is a well-studied problem in algebra. one simple approach that works is to pick a prime number m, and change the meaning of +, –, and × so that values "wrap around" at m. for example, if we picked m=7, then: 6 + 1 = 0 (mod 7) 4 + 5 = 2 (mod 7) 3 × 3 = 2 (mod 7) etc. here is how to visualize the field: since 7 is a prime number, this is an example of a finite field. additions, subtractions, multiplications and even divisions work in a finite field, and so our parity equations will work even modulo 7. in some sense, finite fields are more convenient than integers: dividing two integers does not necessarily give you an integer (e.g., 5 / 2), but in a finite field, division of two values always gives you another value in the field (e.g., 5 / 2 = 6 mod 7). division modulo a prime is not trivial to calculate – you need to use the extended euclidean algorithm – but it is pretty fast. but, modular arithmetic forms a finite field only if the modulus is prime. if the modulus is composite, we have a finite ring, but not a finite field, which is not good enough for our equations to work. furthermore, in computing we like to deal with bytes or multiples of bytes. and, the range of a byte is 256, which is definitely not a prime number. 257 is a prime number, but that still doesn’t really work for us… if the inputs are bytes, our p and q values will sometimes come out as 256, which doesn’t fit into a byte. finally, galois fields the finite fields we described so far are all of size m, where m is a prime number. it is possible to construct finite fields of size m k , where m is a prime number and k is a positive integer. the solution is called a galois field. the particular galois field of interest is gf (2 8 ) where: addition is xor. subtraction is same as addition; also xor. multiplication can be implemented as gf_ilog [ gf_log [ a ] + gf_log [ b ]], where gf_log is a logarithm in the galois field, and gf_ilog is its inverse. gf_log and gf_ilog can be tables computed ahead of time. division can then calculated as gf_ilog [ gf_log [ a ] – gf_log [ b ]], so we can reuse the same tables used by multiplication. the actual calculation of the logarithm and inverse logarithm tables is beyond the scope of the article, but if you would like to learn more about the details ,there are plenty of in-depth articles on galois fields online. in the end, a gf (2 8 ) field gives us exactly what we wanted. it is a field of size 2 8 , and it gives us efficient +, –, ×, / operators that we can use to calculate p and q , and if needed recalculate a lost data block from the remaining data blocks and parities. and, each of p and q perfectly fits into a byte. the resulting coding is called reed-solomon error correction, and that’s the method used by raid 6 configuration: final comments the article explains the overall approach to implementing a raid-6 storage scheme based on gf(2 8 ). it is possible to use other galois fields, such as the 16-bit gf(2 16 ), but the 8-bit field is most often used in practice. also, it is possible to calculate additional parities to protect against additional device failures: r = 1 2 a + 2 2 b + 3 2 c + 4 2 d + 5 2 e s = 1 3 a + 2 3 b + 3 3 c + 4 3 d + 5 3 e … finally, the examples in this article used 5 data blocks per stripe, but that’s an arbitrary choice – any number works, as far as the parity calculation is concerned. related reading the mathematics of raid-6 , h. peter anvin. algorithms 9 comments » apr 21 is two to the power of infinity more than infinity? igor ostrovsky on april 21st, 2011 do you know whether this inequality is true? it’s a simple question, but with an intriguing and revealing answer. infinity #1 one concept of infinity that most people would have encountered in a math class is the infinity of limits. with limits, we can try to understand 2 ∞ as follows: the inf

URL analysis for igoro.com

http://igoro.com/archive/use-c-dynamic-typing-to-conveniently-access-internals-of-an-object/
http://igoro.com/archive/2008/09/
http://igoro.com/archive/numbers-that-cannot-be-computed/
http://igoro.com/archive/2011/
http://igoro.com/archive/2009/11/
http://igoro.com/archive/2009/02/
http://igoro.com/archive/2007/06/
http://igoro.com/archive/what-really-happens-when-you-navigate-to-a-url/comment-page-4/#comment-246088
http://igoro.com/archive/why-computers-represent-signed-integers-using-twos-complement/#comments
http://igoro.com/archive/what-really-happens-when-you-navigate-to-a-url/comment-page-4/#comment-248664
http://igoro.com/archive/category/cool-stuff/
http://igoro.com/feed/
http://igoro.com/archive/2009/06/
http://igoro.com/archive/what-really-happens-when-you-navigate-to-a-url/
http://igoro.com/archive/fast-and-slow-if-statements-branch-prediction-in-modern-processors/

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: IGORO.COM
Registry Domain ID: 202375664_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com
Registrar URL: http://www.tucows.com
Updated Date: 2018-07-30T05:04:48Z
Creation Date: 2005-08-28T19:55:01Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-08-28T19:55:01Z
Registrar: Tucows Domains Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 69
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS49.SERVERQUALITY.COM
Name Server: NS50.SERVERQUALITY.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2018-12-21T03:12:29Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR Tucows Domains Inc.

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =igoro.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME igoro.com

  CHANGED 2018-07-30

  CREATED 2005-08-28

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS49.SERVERQUALITY.COM 67.228.48.114

  NS50.SERVERQUALITY.COM 174.36.215.10

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .